utterance$89251$ - definitie. Wat is utterance$89251$
Diclib.com
Woordenboek ChatGPT
Voer een woord of zin in in een taal naar keuze 👆
Taal:

Vertaling en analyse van woorden door kunstmatige intelligentie ChatGPT

Op deze pagina kunt u een gedetailleerde analyse krijgen van een woord of zin, geproduceerd met behulp van de beste kunstmatige intelligentietechnologie tot nu toe:

  • hoe het woord wordt gebruikt
  • gebruiksfrequentie
  • het wordt vaker gebruikt in mondelinge of schriftelijke toespraken
  • opties voor woordvertaling
  • Gebruiksvoorbeelden (meerdere zinnen met vertaling)
  • etymologie

Wat (wie) is utterance$89251$ - definitie

MEASURE OF LINGUISTIC PRODUCTIVITY IN CHILDREN
Mean utterance length

utter         
  • A mother kissing her baby daughter
  • A black and white icon of two people talking to indicate discussion with one another
SMALLEST UNIT OF SPEECH
Utter; Linguistic utterance; Utterances; Uttered
v. 1) to issue a forged document. 2) to speak. See also: forgery
utterance         
  • A mother kissing her baby daughter
  • A black and white icon of two people talking to indicate discussion with one another
SMALLEST UNIT OF SPEECH
Utter; Linguistic utterance; Utterances; Uttered
n.
Pronunciation, expression, delivery.
utter         
  • A mother kissing her baby daughter
  • A black and white icon of two people talking to indicate discussion with one another
SMALLEST UNIT OF SPEECH
Utter; Linguistic utterance; Utterances; Uttered
v. (B) she uttered a few words to them

Wikipedia

Mean length of utterance

Mean length of utterance (or MLU) is a measure of linguistic productivity in children. It is traditionally calculated by collecting 100 utterances spoken by a child and dividing the number of morphemes by the number of utterances. A higher MLU is taken to indicate a higher level of language proficiency.

Mean length of utterance is a good marker of language impairment. It is the number of words or morphemes in each of their spontaneous utterances. It can be used to benchmark language acquisition and is used to compare language intervention outcomes in children with autism. In testing of children ages 3-9 with diagnoses of autism or autism spectrum disorders and nonverbal IQ scores below 85, results indicated that children with autism persistently scored below the unaffected group without significant improvement in scores concerning mean length of utterance. There may be variability in outcomes due to sampling differences.

A study by Bishop and Adams (1990) suggests that MLU at 4.5 is a good predictor of reading ability at age 8. Nonetheless MLU is considered controversial, and should not be used as the only diagnostic measure of language proficiency in children.